Is Scam or Legit? Uncovering The Truth bills itself as a provider of plugins, tweaks, and installers for various mobile games and apps. However, as with any service offering what appear to be “hacks” or unauthorized mods, skepticism is warranted.

In this comprehensive review, we’ll take an objective look at to determine whether it presents any red flags of a scam, and where legitimate concerns may lie if it is actually providing the services advertised.

By the end, readers should have the information necessary to make an informed decision about whether using’s offerings is reasonably safe or risks exposing themselves or devices to harm.

An Overview of’s Offerings

The first step in any review is understanding exactly what a company or website is providing. On the surface, advertises “plugins” and installers for a wide range of popular games and apps for both iOS and Android devices.

Some examples listed on the homepage include plugins for Pokemon GO, Subway Surfers, TikTok, COD Mobile, IMVU, Roblox, and many others.

Scrolling further down the homepage, visitors are greeted by images and brief descriptions of these various plugins. Common themes among the plugins include claiming to unlock additional in-game currency, resources, or items without limits.

For example, one plugin is advertised as providing “9999999 Coins” for an unspecified game. Others aim to “jailbreak” or bypass limitations on apps like TikTok or allow playing games not available in certain regions.

In addition to plugins for games, also lists emulators and installers for platforms like GameBoy Advance, PlayStation, Xbox and more.

This raises eyebrows, as emulators themselves are typically legal to use but hosting and distributing copyrighted game files often is not. Lastly, some rather questionable looking plugins claim to provide things like “Google Opinion Rewards Unlimited Points 100k+” which is clearly an exploit.

So in summary, appears to offer various means of modifying, bypassing restrictions on, or exploiting popular mobile games, apps and services – which understandably invites suspicion about the legitimacy and safety of such offerings. However, to make a fully informed judgment call here requires digging deeper.

Examining’s trustworthiness through multiple lenses

When vetting any website providing potentially sensitive services, it’s crucial to examine multiple objective factors beyond just claims alone:

Domain Registration & Security Details

Looking up the WHOIS records for’s domain shows it was registered only 10 months ago in October 2021. This is a potential red flag, as legitimacy tends to correlate with longer domain age and ownership history.

Also Read:  Beware the TradingView Token Scam - Don't Fall Victim

However, the registrant information is also hidden using a privacy protection service, so the true owners cannot be identified – another questionable sign.

As for security, the site does use HTTPS which helps prevent snooping of traffic. However, a quick scan with multiple online tools reveals the certificate is untrusted and not signed by a trusted Certificate Authority. This means there is no verification of the site’s authenticity.

Social Profiles & Online Presence

Searches for on social platforms like Facebook, Twitter turn up no official or verified profiles. Similarly, the brand name generates no meaningful web search results beyond the site itself. An established service would normally have some social media engagement or third party web mentions to validate its presence and credibility.

Payment Options & Pricing Model

Most plugins and services are only accessible with a “VIP Membership” requiring payment. Accepted methods include cryptocurrencies, PayPal, and debit/credit cards. However, no company registration details are provided to identify the actual business behind EZYPlugin.

Similarly, there is no detailed explanation of what value-added services the membership unlocks beyond “access to all plugins”. This opacity is a red flag.

App Integration & Technical Implementation

The site claims the plugins can be installed via IPA/APK files without jailbreaking devices. However, no technical documentation or guided tutorials are available to explain exactly how the plugins integrate and operate –

a notable omission given the technical nature. Furthermore, there are no app listings or direct downloads on official app stores which would involve the standard review process.

In summary, an objective analysis of against standard credibility factors like domain history, online presence, transparency, and technical implementation reveals no verifiable confirmation of legitimacy.

While not outright proof of a scam, the various ambiguities and omissions collectively suggest elevated risk. Readers should therefore approach this with caution and skepticism.

Examining Specific Plugin Offerings in Detail

Beyond the website itself, we can gain useful insights by taking a closer look at some of’s specific advertised plugin offerings:

Pokemon GO Spoofer – At a basic level, geo-spoofing or location spoofing Pokemon Go is generally against the game’s Terms of Service and could risk account bans. More concerning is the unclear technical details here – spoofing requires system-level modifications yet these plugins claim to work without jailbreaking which seems implausible.

Also Read:  America's Favorite Pet Scam or Legit? Reviews

Subway Surfers Coin/Key Generator – Unlimited virtual currency generators are almost always exploit tools rather than legitimate modifications, with the high likelihood of triggering anti-cheat measures in games.

TikTok “9999999 Coins” Plugin – TikTok has no concept of virtual coins so this is nonsensically described. Likely an attempt to entice buyers with an unlimited currency claim without understanding the targeted service.

ROBLOX “Menu” – Like the Pokemon GO spoofer, any plugin deeply modifying the ROBLOX game environment locally seems impossible without risky jailbreaking. Again technical clarity is lacking.

Google Opinion Rewards “Unlimited Points” – Obviously this is describing an exploit tool to scam the rewards survey program, not a legitimate plugin.

The common pattern among these examples is the presentation of technically dubious claims which don’t align with how the target services actually function, combined with a lack of clarification. More reputable modding/hacking communities at least provide documentation for Evaluation & Personal Use.

Overall, taken together these signs point towards empty promises and a higher probability of consumer harm from faulty, risky or outright deceptive tools rather than helpful plugins.

Customer Service & Support Standards

Beyond products, evaluating a company’s interactions and responsiveness to customers is another important factor. A scroll through’s comment section turns up very few remarks overall, though some do report issues with downloads or plugins not working as described.

I attempted to inquire about a specific plugin via the online chat and was immediately connected to “Jake” who attempted to directly upsell me to a “VIP” subscription without addressing my original question.

When asked for documentation or details on implementation, the representative replied they could not provide any information without payment and quickly disengaged from the chat.

This lack of transparent, problem-solving communication is a notable poor practice compared to reputable tech communities which prioritize addressing concerns openly. The immediate focus on monetization versus clarifying products also aligns with the profile of a potentially illegitimate operator.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Last but not least, there are important legal and ethical issues involved with any service providing potentially unauthorized game modifications:

  • Violating terms of services and EULAs: As mentioned, many of the targeted games and apps expressly prohibit modifications like currency generators, geo-spoofing, etc. Promoting known ToS-breaking tools invites legal liability.

  • Facilitating exploits & scams: Some plugins openly advertise things like Google survey exploit tools that help scam legitimate programs and damage trust in the targeted brands/services.

  • Distributing pirated software/files: Hosting copyrighted emulator game ROMs or files without permission would be illegal regardless of any disclaimers.

  • Security/privacy risks: Faulty exploits and hacks can potentially compromise user devices/accounts or expose sensitive info if not implemented carefully with user consent.

  • Potential for malware distribution: Unscrupulous actors have been known to include malware in pirated/crack software distributions as another monetization scheme.

Also Read:  cyber kidnapping scam or legit? uncovering the truth

On the whole, the combination of legal ambiguities, technical implausibility of some claims and lack of care or transparency in how user data/devices could be impacted paint a troubled ethical picture, even beyond scam concerns.

Is Worth The Risk?

To summarize the detailed analysis provided: presents several clear warning signs characteristic of disreputable or potentially fraudulent operators based on objective factors like domain history, organizational opacity, imbalanced focus on monetization over communication.

Many of the explicitly advertised plugins make technically dubious claims that either don’t align with how the targeted services function or promote exploits/ToS violations rather than legitimate tools.

Customer interactions suggest prioritizing upsells over addressing user problems transparently, while technical implementation remains unexplained despite the technical nature.

Legal and ethical issues abound around violating ToS agreements, facilitating exploits/scams, potential piracy and lack of security best practices that could compromise users.

While technically not outright proof of a scam, the preponderance of evidence from numerous angles suggests is very high risk for consumers in terms of the legitimacy and safety of both products and operator.

Some potential concerns include receiving broken, faulty or misrepresented products, having personal information stolen due to poor security practices or even exposing devices to malware.

At the same time, complete condemnation requires acknowledging the possibility, however slight, that aspects could potentially function safely if implemented properly by a trustworthy party focused on education over monetization.

However, the numerous red flags clearly outweigh any such benefit of the doubt at this stage given the information available.

Unless and until takes major corrective actions like open communication on technical implementation, addressing known issues transparently,

clearly separating implausible claims from factual information and demonstrating a good-faith commitment to user security, consent and ethics – they will remain untrusted by objective observers.

Also Read: Is Reuters Technology Group Scam or Legit?